Make The Most of Your Journey Home

Flicker photo by pamhule

Flicker photo by pamhule

By Mark Stuckey

If you’re like me, and have quite a trek home after an arduous day at College of Law, you might just want to plug in your head phones and space out to some Devo, or whatever the kids are listening to these days, but you shouldn’t, because there are better ways to use your time on your commute home!

Read For Class

If you take MARTA, reading on the train can be a lifesaver. Using your time wisely on the train allows you to prepare for that cold-call tomorrow (well maybe), and frees up time at home for more worthwhile pursuits (like GTA 5). Pro tip: I have found that if you seem really engrossed with your case book and mutter to yourself a little, no one will sit next you… so there’s that.

Use Flashcards

Whether you make them yourself or sell your first born for some commercial ones, flash cards are extremely helpful when attempting to memorize important general terms, and elements. Plus, that guy who is looking over your shoulder on the train needs to know the elements of a prima facie negligence case. You can check out flash cards at the Circulation desk.

Also, there is a website called Quizlet where you can make flashcards and use them on the website or download an app and use them on the go. Find Quizlet here! Some law students have already made flash cards so if you are feeling lackadaisical, just use theirs. (if you trust them)

Listen to Sum and Substance Audio Recordings/Audio Case Files

Whether you’re on the train, in the car, or riding your bike, you can listen to top law professors who literally complied the casebook. Check out the sum and substance Audio Cd’s from the Circulation Desk put them on your Ipod and never look back. I especially enjoy these tapes, because it is like having a lecture on demand. See what subjects we have at the library here!

Every GSU Law student has access to Audio Case Files, which has edited audio versions of judicial opinions, as well as full opinions, fact summaries and all sorts of wonderful things to make your life easier. You can create a free account by using your GSU email address. Find out more information here.

Reflect on the Lecture

A gruff professor recommended this gem on one of the first days of my Contracts 1 class so there’s probably some merit to it. As I gather, the idea is to try to pull out the key points of the Lecture without looking at notes, and organize them in a way that make sense. Writing this down would probably be good, but a tape recorder might serve just as well.

There you have it, a few very obvious ways to get the most out of your commute home. Comment below if you have any other ways to study on the go!

Legal Bibliography Exam Tips

by Joshua Kahn

Students taking the bar exam.A lot of the legal bibliography exam boils down to memorization and, frankly, memorization is boring.  For many people, memorization means reading a list over and over again, or, for the more industrious among us, flash cards.  Neither really works all that well.

Personally, if I had to do it over again, I would try using a memory palace.

A memory palace is an old, simple, effective tool for using your spatial memory to remember non-special information (like how often different legal authority sources are updated).

Essentially, you bring a physical location you know well into your memory—like the house you grew up in, or your route to school—and populate it with vivid images representing the information you want to remember.  Then, when you need the information, you just “walk” back through your memory palace and look at the images.

You don’t need to buy any books to learn the technique, here are a few places you can look at online for free:

http://litemind.com/memory-palace/ (a helpful modern explanation)

http://www.utexas.edu/research/memoria/Ad_Herennium_Passages.html (Ad Herennium is the an ancient text that sets out the technique, don’t worry, it’s translated and very short)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_loci

http://www.wikihow.com/Build-a-Memory-Palace

 

Exam Tips

by Joshua Kahn

Image by Flickr user albertogp123

Image by Flickr user albertogp123

You’ve spent what seems like the longest couple of months since you-were-6-and-summer-felt-like-forever doing your reading, going to class, and outlining.  Now, you’re wondering, how to ace your 1L exams, land the job of your dreams, make tons of money and guarantee a lifetime of blissfully safe employment. . . right?

So, here are a few helpful pointers for exams:

Learn Your Professor’s Style

Every professor has a specific exam style, which they’ll generally telegraph over the course of the semester. If not, then ask them about it in person.  Also, make sure to track down 2L’s and 3L’s to ask them about that professor’s style.  Often, they’ll have helpful insights into what to expect on the exam.

Short Test Outline

Once you begin studying, the first thing you should do is write a concise version of your outline.  It should have big font, not be spaced in tiny clusters of sentences, and focus on the elements of each claim.  Cut as much as possible until you only have the core elements and tests for the areas of law you learned.

This short outline is your cheat-sheet for the exam, not a security blanket.  It’s a way to remind you of the elements to make sure you don’t forget something, not re-teach you the material on the fly.

If your professor only lets you have a single front-and-back sheet, then use different colors to differentiate elements and tests visually. The idea is to be able to quickly glance at the sheet and know what you’re looking for.

If you have a closed book exam, just ignore this and do more practice tests, memorize what you need with flash cards or both.

Taking Practice Exams

Practice exams are by far the best way to study for law school exams.  Take a few untimed and fully write out your answers, don’t just outline them (which will be tempting).  Then, take at least one fully timed practice exam for each course.  That process will help you with both analysis and speed once the pressure is on.

Many people find it helpful to go over their practice exams with a study group to see if they got the answers right, and get suggestions from classmates.  Often, they’ll actually take the exams together all at once in a library room to simulate the pressure of an in-class exam.

This is one of the very few things study groups are useful for, but, don’t let it take too much time.  Practice exams are painful and it’s very tempting to talk through them to avoid having to take another.

Finding Practice Exams

GSU has an exam archive and professors often give out a copy of past exam, but it’s a good idea to practice on exams from other schools.

Most exam archives are password protected, but here are a few which are not:

http://lawmedia.pepperdine.edu/exam/examlookup.php

http://www.law.berkeley.edu/library/dynamic/exams.php

Readability

Law school exams reward clear writing.  If you’re a good, concise writer, your grades will probably be one step or so higher than otherwise (from, say, a B+ to and A-).  If you are not a good writer, there probably isn’t much you can do about it in the next month, so pretend I didn’t just say this. (But consider reading this over your break).

There is one thing anyone can do to quickly improve their exam readability however, and that’s clearly organize your paper.  Include headings for each section and subsection so your professor knows exactly what points you are addressing, start a new paragraph for each element of the claim you’re proving, etc.

It is OK to Be Nervous

Finally, it is ok to be nervous.  Law school exams are a horrible hazing ritual, especially 1L exams, and they never stop being nerve-wracking.

A Faint Light at the End of the Tunnel

by Nirvi Shah

Flicker photo by jjpacres

Flicker photo by jjpacres

Law school is hard.  You are told this before you begin, but have no idea what you signed up for until you are in the thick of it—like right now. Due to the sheer anxiety and stress from preparing for classes and outlining for exams, it can be difficult to appreciate the art of legal writing and citation.  Learning how to “think like a lawyer” is very important, but this skill will not be effective if you do not learn how to write like a lawyer.

No matter where your legal career takes you, you will write memorandums, briefs, and emails to colleagues and clients.  You will also consistently cite your text to confirm that what you say is based on law and merited sources.  And after practicing to write in this seemingly secret language for some time, you will begin to understand how to approach legal issues and feel your sense of belonging in the legal community.

If this is still not enough to inspire you to continue working on legal writing and citation, read the cited case written by Judge Kent.  He publicly humiliates attorneys for their lack of professionalism by broadcasting that “[b]oth attorneys have obviously entered into a secret pact–complete with hats, handshakes and cryptic words–to draft their pleadings entirely in crayon on the back sides of gravy-stained paper place mats, in the hope that the Court would be so charmed by their child-like efforts that their utter dearth of legal authorities in their briefing would go unnoticed.”  Bradshaw v. Unity Marine Corp., 147 F. Supp. 2d 668, 670 (S.D. Tex. 2001) (emphasis added).

You do not want to be these attorneys, so take the time to practice legal writing and citation while you are in law school, where the stakes are not as high.  You will definitely find these skills valuable later.

Good luck with the rest of the semester!

Clinic Open House

by Mark Stuckey

Members of the GSU Tax Clinic

Members of the GSU Tax Clinic

On Wednesday, October 16th, the Low Income Tax Payer, Investor Advocacy, Health Law Partnership (HeLP) Legal Services, and Faculty of Fundamentals of Law Practice/Domestic Violence Clinics will be hosting open houses from noon to 1. While clinics may not initially come to mind when you think about the traditional law school experience, there are multiple reasons you should take at least one semester of a practicum.

First, in the clinics offered at GSU Law, law students interact with clients one on one. For example right now I work in the tax clinic, and I am responsible for six client’s cases before the IRS. Communication with clients in clinic environments helps develop interpersonal communication skills that the trepidation instilled by the Socratic Method in traditional courses frankly cannot.

Next, working in a clinic looks good on a resume, and can help you produce a proper writing sample. Don’t have any actual legal working experience? Bolster your resume with some non-profit legal work on actual cases while earning course credit. Additionally, in GSU Law’s clinics, (Tax Clinic especially) students produce memos on behalf of their clients. Let’s face it, a well-crafted memo for a real client (redacted of course) under the supervision of experts in the field (shout out to Professor Blasi) is better than Harvey Woodley any day.

Also, clinics are great if you have no idea which area of law you want to practice in. You, the directionless law student, can sample a broad scope of fields, and who knows you might fall in love with the delicate nuances of the I.R.C.

Finally, the fringe benefits. I haven’t paid valuable consideration for a cup of coffee for well over 2 months. And as a law student, I drink a liquid ton of the stuff. How have I pulled off this wallet-friendly feat? Well, there’s always a hot pot of coffee in the Tax Clinic! And don’t get me started on the random acts of pizza and chicken biscuits.

So do yourself a favor and go check out all the clinics! Click here for the info!

Be sure to check out the websites for more details about the particular clinics.

Blueacre

by Mark Stuckey

Urban Life 1With the momentous ground breaking that took place on GSU’s new law building last Thursday, I wanted to take some time to reminisce about my favorite aspects of the current law school. Sure, the new building will be state of the art and sustainable, but I will undoubtedly miss the Urban Life Building, the place that has been much more of a home to me over the last arduous year than my dingy, dark Atlanta apartment. There are too many things to list, but here are some of my personal favorites ULB has to offer:

1. The Lack of Stairs

The designers of the Urban Life Building, like all self respecting Americans, had a robust disdain for aerobic activities. Hence the fact that the law school’s upper floors are only accessible via elevator. This revolutionary feature is exceedingly convenient when exiting a 6th floor lecture hall with 90 of your closest friends. Pro tip: There is a semi-secret staircase connecting the first and second floors by the career services office.

2. Weird Bathrooms

If you have not noticed go check out one of the numerous bathrooms that call the Urban Life Building their domicile. Not only is the decor cold war chic, but also the acoustics are redolent of Atlanta Symphony Hall. Additionally, the bathrooms in the Urban Life Building make it easier to get closer to your classmates (physically at least) when navigating their narrow thoroughfares. Pro tip: I am pretty sure the sixth floor men’s bathroom is haunted by a friendly ghost.

3. Intermittency of Cell Service

Probably the best features of the Urban Life Building are the random black holes that renders that device on which you play Candy Crush useless. This is especially helpful when you need a little extra motivation to pay attention in Civ Pro, or when you’re seeking isolation on the second floor of the library from you non law school friends (who will never understand what you’re going through).

There you have it, a short and rather incomplete list of the parts of the Urban Life Building I will miss the most. Luckily, there is still time to enjoy the idiosyncrasies. Comment below and tell me what you like about the Urban Life Building!

How to Outline

by Joshua Kahn

MacBook writing (Håkan Dahlström) / CC BY 2.0

Today, we have our second installment in the Blackacre Times’ “how do I do this whole law school thing” series—how to write an outline. If you haven’t already read the quick and dirty guide for 1Ls, you should probably start there.

Like almost everything in law school, outlining is one of those things that sounds scarier than it really is.  Basically, an outline is just a scaled down version of your notes that 1) only includes the things that actually matter, and 2) puts those things that matter in an order that shows how they relate to each other.  It is NOT a compilation of every word that has ever fallen out of your professor’s mouth bound in a pretty little binder with tabs.

The real value of outlining is that it forces you to recognize what is important and how it’s important.  That’s why you should always write your own outline, that process is some of your best studying.

So how should an outline look?  Well, everyone has their own method that fits the way they think, but I’m going to use a section of my Corporations outline as an example.  Please take a minute to scroll down and look over it.  It’s discussing situations where an individual or corporation can be liable for the dumb things someone working for them does, even without the employer’s permission.  This is only about 1/3rd of my outline’s agency section, so don’t worry if you don’t understand exactly what it’s talking about.

Ok, finished reading?  Good.  Now I’m going to break down the specific components of the outline.

Easy to Read

First, my outline is formatted to be easy to read.  For some reason I’ll never understand, it’s traditional to write outlines in one font size, without much space between the lines and without a ton of underlining or bold type.  Obviously, I don’t hold by that.  If you want to use your outline on a test, it should be easy to read. I make headings bigger and bold, underline cases, and put citations in parenthesis, etc.

Logical Categories

Next, outlines should be broken down into logical (to you) categories.  A lot of this is optional and more art than science.  I based my contracts outline around the various ways a contract can be formed, for example.  In the example below, I thought that the torts consequences of agency deserved its own section because it’s very easy to spot in a fact pattern.  I could, however, have chosen to include it as a subcategory of the consequences of the formation of an agency relationship and if I had done that, I would have had a completely different organization for the section.

Elements

This is the meat of an outline. Your goal when outlining should be to break anything you possibly can down into clear legal tests with specific elements.  Then, when you see that point on a test, you can just run through those elements.

Take a look at the three numbers listed under “elements” towards the top.  Those are the test to run to see whether an employer is liable for someone else’s actions.  Below, I have a section labeled “notes” with numbers that correspond to each of those elements. You’ll find that most of the content of a law school class boils down to a few main tests, and all the special rules for various exceptions to those main tests. The exceptions are usually exceptions to one of those elements, not all of them, and I put the exceptions into notes corresponding to those elements.

In this case, there are a lot of ways to meet the various elements, so I’ve chosen to organize them under the notes section.  So, to see if you have met element one—an “agency relationship”—you go down to note one and see that you can do that with either “actual authority” or “apparent agency.”

Look more closely at “actual authority” under note 1.  It includes a list of factors that suggest that an employer either has, or does not have, enough control over the employee to create actual authority.  On a test, you’d look at those factors in the fact patter the professor gives to you, and discuss as many as possible.

Citations

Although most professors do not require it, a number like it when you include citations to specific cases or statutes on your final. Don’t try and remember all of that off the top of your head. What I do is include citations to cases and statutes in my outline next to whatever it is those cases show.  For example, under note 1, the sentence “parties cannot disclaim agency” is followed by a citation to the case “Holiday Inns.” That means that the Holiday Inns case shows that parties can’t disclaim agency.  So, when you run into a situation where that applies on the test, just write it down and throw “(see Holiday Inns)” into your answer.  You don’t have to remember the case name, and have all the citations right in front of you to grab quickly.

When to Start Outlining

The traditional answer is about half way through the semester, but that’s not set in stone.  If you can pull it off, you can literally take your notes directly into outline form (don’t try this until your second semester at the earliest).  For your first semester though, you’re better off waiting until you get a feel for how the areas of law you are studying fit together.  Early on, you won’t be able to pick out what’s important and what isn’t.  Later, you can do that much more quickly.  The main thing in 1L is not to wait until the last second to do your outline.

———————-

Agency Tort Liability

Vicarious Liability

-Principals are liable for acts if…

Elements (2nd Rest. §§ 219(1) & 250))

  1. 1.      Agency Relationship (e.g. Master-Servant)
  2. 2.      Act was within Scope of Employment

OR          

3.  Independent Contractor doing Inherently Dangerous Activity

Notes:

1.  Agency Relationship (Master Servant vs. Independent Contractor)

Actual Authority

-Established by sufficient Control (2nd Rest. § 220)

-Parties Cannot Disclaim agency (Case: Holiday Inns)

(Case: Humble control can exist even when contract disclaims, ex of franchise with enough control for master-servant)

(Case: Hoover ex of franchise without enough control for master-servant)

(Case: Holiday Inns ex of franchise without enough control for master-servant)

Factors showing Control: (Case: Conoco factors for scope discussed )

NOTE: Control associated with the harm is stronger evidence

-Controls Time of work

-Controls Method of work

-Controls Manner of work

-Works for one boss or many

-Can complete task however they see fit

-1099 or W-2?  (not definitive)

-Who has the right to hire/fire?

-Do they bring own supplies & tools?

Apparent Agency

(Definition Note:  Apparent Agency establishes agency where none would have existed, Apparent Authority expands authority that already exists)

Elements for Apparent Agency liability (2nd Rest. § 267) (Case: Miller)

  1. Principal Held Out party as an Agent
  2. Plaintiff relied on that holding out

(Case: Miller ex apparent agency establishing apparent agency over franchisor even without enough control for master-servant)

2.  Act was within Scope of Employment

-Scope of Employment if “Employer Benefits from Action”

(2nd Rest. § 228) (Case: Bushey)

Test: Conduct Reasonably Related or Reasonably Foreseeable

Intentional Torts (2nd Rest. § 231 & 228(2))

-Reasonable Related if:

1.  Foreseeable by Master (2nd Rest. § 228(2)

OR            2.  “Manning” Standard (Case: Manning)

A.  In response to P’s conduct

B.  Which was interfering w/ employees ability to perform duties

3. Facilitated by access the position provides (Case: Conoco)

3.  Independent Contractor doing Inherently Dangerous Activity

Principal is liable if…

1.  “Inherently Dangerous Activities” (e.g. a “nuisance per se”)

(2nd Rest. of Torts § 416)

(Case: Majestic ex of inherently dangerous activity)

TEST:  Particular risk of substantial harm

in the absence of special precautions

-factual inquiry

-remember: NOT strict liability/ultra-hazardous

-Harm must come from the basic reason the act was dangerous

-Otherwise, Collateral Negligence and employer not liable

2.  Hiring Incompetent Contractor (Case: Majestic)

3.  Principal Retains Control over manner & means of work (Case: Majestic)

Do This Now, So You Don’t Pay Later. Seriously.

by Nirvi Shah

Study_AidsA few weeks ago my friend, Joshua Kahn, posted “A Quick & Dirty Guide for 1Ls.”  Each of his points are accurate and helpful.  One topic in particular, however, I found most beneficial during my 1L year.  Practicing hypotheticals helps you score better on exams.  The more you practice, the better you do.

Buying study aids can get expensive, and Googling examples may take up too much time.  That is where the Law Library comes in.

The library has study aids.  Many, many, many study aids.  Multiple copies of some books.  While they are all on the shelves right now, they probably will not be around exam times.  That is when you will need them the most.  Why am I pushing you to use the study aids now, before you have even started outlining?

Most law students aren’t really sure about what is going on during their 1L year—especially when it comes to learning class materials and giving professors good answers on the exam.  (If you are one of the few who knows exactly what is going on, that’s awesome—good for you.)  Some professors may claim that students don’t need any study aids or supplements to do well in their class, but honestly, it can’t hurt.

This is why you should get up, walk to the “Law Student Study Aids” section, pick out a book that is written in a way you find easy to read and understand, and start skimming the relevant chapter.  If you don’t start now, you will not have time to search and scan appropriate examples, find the book when exams roll around, or you will have to come to terms with paying more money on books this semester just to use the study aids for a few weeks period, if even that.

Just remember, always put the study aids back in the area, where the sign says, “PUT STUDY AIDS HERE WHEN YOU’RE DONE.”

Good luck with 1L year!

A Quick & Dirty Guide for 1Ls

by Joshua Kahn

Image by Flickr user your_teacher

Image by Flickr user your_teacher

This post is for all the 1Ls.  We know you are new to campus, wracked by fear of the unknown, overwhelmed by readings, terrified that your entire grade is dependent on a single test… confused about what you’re supposed to do in class, before class  and. . . and. . . and. . . STOP!

Now, take a deep breath and repeat:  It is not that bad.

The faculty will offer a number of talks this semester about how to outline, what it means to take good notes, how to take a test, etc.  And that’s all well and good.  You should go.  Really.  But in the meantime one 3L working at the library would like to offer his short take on surviving and prospering in law school, in addition to all the other worthy advice you’re being bombarded with.  This advice is NOT the official opinion of the library or its staff, but, hopefully, it will help put things in perspective.

To Thine Own Self Be True

First, and most importantly, know your own learning style.  If you find you remember the somewhat esoteric jurisdiction law in civil procedure when you read the cases carefully, great.  If you prefer a hornbook, great.  Right now, try both and see what works for you. That’s probably the most productive thing you can do the first month; experiment with different pieces of advice, see what works for you, stop doing the things that don’t work, and do more of the things that do. That way, you’ll be using your time productively by mid-semester.

Preparing for Class

You do not need to show up every day with a typed brief of every case. You do not need to highlight every word of your casebook in your own special highlighter code. If these things help you, fantastic, but they are not necessary or helpful for most law students.

You do need to read the cases, but remember this:  Every case is designed to illustrate one point of law. The facts of each individual case are only important in so far as they illustrate that point of law. Yes, getting used to seeing how facts and law interact in cases is good general lawyer training, but it’s not the central takeaway for your grade (however, see the “because” section of this post below).

A word on being called on in class. . . don’t worry about it. As long as you don’t go out of your way to seem like you know everything, it’s not embarrassing to be stumped by your professor (if you are that guy/gal who always talks, your classmates will probably indulge in some Schadenfreude when they watch you twist in the wind).

More importantly, being called on is irrelevant to your grades. It helps professors run their classes smoothly when students know the facts of the cases inside and out. For students, however, spending too much time memorizing the facts of a case that is just there to illustrate a point of law takes time away from potentially more helpful studying. (more on this later)

Many 2L or 3L law students read a case, then write down a sentence or a few words reminding them what it’s about and what the main point is. For example: “guy falls down stairs, stairs not up to code, negligence per se?” Please though, READ the cases.

Taking Notes

Every case in your case book is there to tell you some important issue of law. If you can’t write down the point of the case in one sentence after the professor goes through the case in your class, you have probably missed something important.  In many classes, the professor will explicitly tell you what this important point is.

Those individual points of law all build into a complete picture of the area of law you’re studying.  It’s rare that one case will, say, explain all of contract law (although a few later cases are a good review, and many professors will point these cases out).  Nearly all cases either tell you a piece of the basic law (“this is what causation means in torts”), or explain a specific exception to that general rule (“these are the special damage rules for breach of construction contracts”).

You should focus your notes on what each individual point is, and how they all fit together. If you don’t understand these main points by the end of class, ask your professor.  Or, go look at a hornbook later and if you still don’t understand, ask after the next class.

Please, please, please don’t focus on the facts of the cases when you are taking notes.  That’s almost never the important takeaway—it’s just a tool to help you get to that takeaway.  Write the facts down if it’s helpful to you, but know that it’s not the main thing.  The exception is sometimes a brief summary of a case can be helpful later, especially for classes where the reasoning of past important cases matter (in 1L, that’s usually the constitutional law cases in Civ Pro I).  And, it’s always helpful when the professor tests on it.

At the beginning of the semester, ask your professors if they want you to cite cases or statutes on their exam.  Most professors don’t, but if they do, you want to know about it and write that information down.  It’s especially common for contracts professors to want those citations. If they do, be more careful about taking notes on specific cases and placing them in your outline later.

Study Groups

I never went to one and firmly believe they are a huge waste of time. I hear they can be helpful towards the end of the semester for taking practice exams and going over the answers together, but during the year, they can be a massive time-waster with little or no productive output.  But maybe they’ll be good for your social life, so there’s that.

Outlines

You shouldn’t worry much about outlines until mid-semester, but for your piece of mind, they are basically a distilled, organized version of your notes.  You should have your outline formatted so you know how each of the little pieces of law those cases teach you fit together into a whole, and see how they form nice little rules with different tests and factors to consider.

Extra Things that Help: Practice Problems

Probably the most helpful thing you can do with your “extra” study time, especially early in the semester, is do practice problems. The study aid section of the library has plenty of books with practice problems. Personally, I think most students would benefit far more—at least as far as grades go—from spending less time, say, carefully briefing (note: still read!) or going to a study group and using the extra time to do practice hypotheticals.

Taking Notes BEFORE Class

If you want to be extra diligent, one way to do this is to do your readings carefully, and BEFORE class, write down the key “takeaway” point of law from each case as if you had taken notes in class already. If you understand it well enough to do this, you’re in great shape and class will be both a review and a way to help catch whether or not you are wrong.

Outside Sources

I found listening to the life of a law student podcasts well before class while, say, commuting or working out, was helpful. I didn’t take it too seriously, but it exposed me to concepts before class started so my reading and class time was the not the first time I heard an idea. Often, concepts stick more effectively the second and third time you hear or read them, and this is a painless way to get that repetition.

Legal Writing

GSU just finished a massive overhaul of its legal writing program, so I don’t have so much guidance to offer here except the following two tidbits.

First, everyone complains that they spent way more time on their legal writing class than their other classes. It just works out that way, but at least be conscious of it and try not to lose perspective.

Second, I found it helpful to just sit down and try to make a good argument, then go back and make that good argument fit into all the stylistic or formatting points they try to teach you. Getting overly caught up in the formatting can hurt the substance of your writing. That said, DO write in IRAC from the start. They’ll tell you what that is in legal writing class (write you exams in IRAC as well).

 “Because”

Without getting too into final exams, which are still very far away, the most important word to your grade is the word “because.” When you write anything in any law school context, ask yourself if you answered the question “because.”  It is very tempting to just restate the rule when writing an exam, but adding the word “because” and filling in everything after is what will get you an A.

The Librarians Are Your Friends

This may sound self-serving coming from the library, but, really, the librarians are paid to help you. If you’re stuck on a research problem, they’ll help you. If you have no idea where to start looking, they’ll help you. If you have no idea how to BEGIN a legal research project, they’ll teach you from scratch if necessary.  This is more important second semester when you start having to do more serious legal research for your writing class, but if you’re stuck on something, ask them.  Very few students take advantage of the librarians’ help.

Summary: What You Should Be Doing Regularly

*Read for class—in whatever depth is helpful to you—focusing on picking out the important point of law the casebook author is trying to teach you.

*Write down sufficient notes on the cases to remember what they were about. This could be a little as a few words or as much as a few paragraphs. But for most people, it’s a few words to a sentence.

*Listen in class, and write down the key point of law each case illustrates. If possible, write how that relates to the other points of law you’ve already learned.

*Take notes on whatever else your professor tells you will be on the test.

*If you don’t understand these key points of law, ask your professor and/or consult a hornbook.

*Optional: Do practice problems, found in the study aid section of the library.

*Optional: Listen to a podcast on the subject matter like http://www.lifeofalawstudent.com.

*Later:  About mid-semester, begin outlining.

*Even Later:  Towards the end of the semester, take practice exams.

Presidential Trivia

presidentialseal

Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

by Lindsey Laforge

July 11 is the anniversary of the swearing in of William Howard Taft as the chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court in 1921. As I am sure you know William Taft was also the 27th President of the United States. After his presidency he took the bench and thus became the only person ever to serve as both President and Supreme Court Chief Justice.

While we are on the topic of interesting facts about former Presidents, here are some tid-bits you may not have been aware of:

  • President Reagan was the only divorced president.
  • President Tyler had the most children at fifteen
  • President Buchanan was the only president never to marry.
  • The Tallest president was President Lincoln at 6’4″
  • President Madison was the shortest at 5’4″
  • 8 U.S. Presidents never attended college
    • The same number were born British subjects
  • Other than the most famous assassinations of Presidents Kennedy and Lincoln, there were also two other Presidential assassinations while in office- Presidents Garfield and McKinley
  • President Van Buren’s first language was Dutch
  • While President Pierce was in office he was arrested for running over an old woman with his horse.
  • President Cleveland is the only President to serve two non-consecutive terms
  • President Theodore Roosevelt was the first American to win a Nobel Prize